On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 8:51 PM David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > > What level of respect should I maintain for the integrity of > > flower/include/yaffut.h? I think it would be nice to limit the > > default output of the unit test program to errors + summary, and I > > could achieve that either by modifying Yaffut itself or by filtering > > the output through a script.
Go wild. There are only 2 (?) small flower lib files that have tests, so I don't think this merits much attention. > My personal opinion for the amount of respect is: none. I didn't even > know it had an existence outside of LilyPond > (<http://members.home.nl/rutger.van.beusekom/> shows dead links and a > Boost licence but it would be my guess that Han-Wen and Jan have > properly handled this at the time the code was pulled into LilyPond and > it would be my guess that its author may be the "Ruth" in LilyPond's > DEDICATION file). I am sure Ruth had nothing to do with Yaffut. > At any rate, it should meet our needs. In a similar vein, there seems > no ongoing point in maintaining "flower" outside of what we need for > LilyPond. agreed. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [email protected] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
