Hi David, Am Montag, den 18.11.2019, 18:10 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld: > Am Samstag, den 16.11.2019, 21:52 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup: > > Carl Sorensen < > > [email protected] > > > > > writes: > > > Dear Team, > > > > > > It seems to me like we are pretty much in shape such that we should > > > release 2.20. I'd be fine if we called 2.19.83-1 the 2.20 release, > > > even if there are some critical regressions. 2.19.83 is SO much > > > better than 2.18.2. > > > > > > IIUC, the only thing 2.20 is waiting on is for David K. to cherry-pick > > > some patches. Is that correct? > > > > And putting out a new prerelease to be sure that those are ok, and > > waiting for the translators to catch up with cherry-picked patches > > containing stuff to be translated. > > > > But the current roadblock is David K. cherry-picking some patches. Here > > is a remaining list (not completely up to date with current master, > > though not missing much) to check for possible inclusion (assuming I > > have not overlooked something important pickable in the sequence > > before). If you see something important here (or something not in > > current master), put in a word for it. > > Thanks for the list of candidates, I processed around half of it for > now (+ some dependencies as mentioned below). > All commits that I think should be "picked" are also readily available > in my branch origin/dev/hahnjo/stable-2.20. Let me know if those are ok > and I can easily push to stable/2.20.
I've noticed that you picked a handful of commits to stable/2.20 last week. Does it still make sense for me to maintain my branch (and continue going through the list) if you're doing the work yourself anyhow? Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
