On 2019/12/16 16:51:59, Dan Eble wrote:
On 2019/12/15 06:29:59, lemzwerg wrote: > Well, the cis–trans pairing is IMHO only understandable for people
who have a
> Latin background (or come from Austria, since it was divided into > »Cisleithanien« and »Transleithanien« in the K. und K. era)... As
nice as it
> is, I suggest that you find names that are easier to comprehend for
other
> people.
I'd like to add named constants to the code. If CIS and TRANS are not
well
liked, how about SAME_WAY and OPPOSITE_WAY?
I'd also like to hear more opinions before changing this. A few years
ago,
I wouldn't have chosen to use "cis," but my perception is that it is
no longer
obscure in North American English.
"cis" sort of is a loaded term for LilyPond. Maybe something like "adjacent" and "opposite"? https://codereview.appspot.com/547340043/
