Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> writes:

>>> and all of those messages are auto-generated.
>> 
>> So?  This does not provide a documented way of getting Guile
>> activated at all unless you are a 14th level system building
>> magician.
>
> I'll try to update the documentation, too.
>
>> So the correct way is to continue _heeding_ GUILE_CONFIG when it is
>> given.
>
> I suggest a deprecation warning like
>
>   GUILE_CONFIG is no longer used.  Please use XXX instead.
>
>> Is there anybody who recently built with a non-system version of
>> Guile-1.8 intentionally?
>
> I do this all the time.

So how did you do it last week?

>> So please, can we stop pretending that anyone building LilyPond is a
>> perfect omniscient programmer?
>
> Usually, I try to insist on good documentation if people implement
> stuff differently.  This time it slipped my attention that Han-Wen's
> changes w.r.t. pkg-config are not properly described.

In this case, I don't think it is sufficient to add documentation
somewhere (though necessary).  People also need to get guided there
instead of stealthily making previously working options do nothing.

-- 
David Kastrup

Reply via email to