On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM Dan Eble <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 15, 2020, at 10:26, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 2:33 AM Dan Eble <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On Mar 14, 2020, at 19:39, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 9:16 PM Dan Eble <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> I assume the warnings are incorrect, otherwise you would be asking for > >>>> help to fix them rather than asking whether checking the HTML is > >>>> valuable. Is that assumption correct? > >>> > >>> The version on Xenial generates these warnings, while the version on > >>> Fedora doesn't, which is pretty confusing. > >> > >> Certainly, but the question is whether they are legitimate. > > > > Nobody has complained about HTML compliance of the regtests, so I > > think this is fine either way. > > Another dodge.
I tried fixing it; Jonas commented that I was replacing the new recommended way with the deprecated one. See https://codereview.appspot.com/563730043/#msg2 -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [email protected] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
