On May 5, 2020, at 11:09, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd like to come up with an allocator/container programming model > comparatively similar to the STL one so that one could mostly steal the > implementations and "just" add the required Scheme awareness while > removing of destruction/deallocation tracking.
It might be difficult for me to devote the time to this discussion that it deserves, but I want to say that I've been working on C++ wrappers that allow walking SCM lists (of immediate values or Smobs) with standard iterator syntax and semantics. I suppose that's tangential to what you are talking about, but it would be disappointing if we did significant overlapping work. Regards, — Dan
