Am Montag, den 22.06.2020, 16:44 -0700 schrieb Owen Lamb: > Thanks, everyone! It looks like jsoncpp should work well for LilyPond. > > I don't have experience with adding files from one project to another. > Jonas, is this "Amalgamated" procedure what you were describing? > https://github.com/open-source-parsers/jsoncpp/wiki/Amalgamated-(Possibly-outdated)
Yes, that's what I did a few years back. I think there used to be amalgamated versions of the releases, not sure if they vanished or I'm just mistaken. In any case, I'd recommend using version 1.8.4; 1.9.x will eventually lead to version 2.0, but the developers are not there yet. > If so, when instructions say to add the generated files to one's project, > does that mean to just copy them into the lilypond-git directory somewhere? Pretty much that, yes. > Where would be a good place to put them? No clue. Historically, that sounds like a job for flower/, but I'm not a fan of the current split between flower/ and lily/. Please get opinions from other developers that have been involved longer than me. Regards Jonas > > Thanks, > Owen > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 5:20 AM Noeck < > noeck.marb...@gmx.de > > wrote: > > > > > 1. LilyPond already seems to use some parts of the BOOST library (which > > > > is kind of the extended C++ STL). > > > > > > Not that I know of. > > > > > > > You're right. I just quickly skimmed through a grep and found this: > > > > > > https://github.com/lilypond/lilypond/blob/master/flower/include/yaffut.hh#L2 > > > > > > or a define HAVE_BOOST_LAMBDA in an older version. > > > > Cheers, > > Joram > > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part