On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 2:43 PM Jonas Hahnfeld <hah...@hahnjo.de> wrote: > > commit 99ee305b37d5804cd215cd8a222ec8a1eccb8caf > > Author: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com> > > Date: Wed Jun 17 23:12:27 2020 +0200 > > > > Write output files atomically > > > > or more precisely after the command to flush PDF output. However, the > > other MR triggered a similar problem before this commit landed in > > master, so I would tend to say that it just triggers an existing > > problem. > > Even if just triggering the problem, we might need to revert at least > the part that provides atomic output with the GS API. Right now, I > think we can only merge if the pipeline after rebase happens to execute > on a runner with enough parallelism. Which is really unfortunate.
No, let's revert the entire thing. There is no urgent business depending on the change. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanw...@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
