>> Note that I don't want that we stay with Guile 1.8 forever, but the
>> slowness of 2.x and 3.x is a serious issue.  To sacrifice this
>> still enormous speed advantage just for the sake of orthodoxy seems
>> wrong to me.
> 
> So 10% performance regression for users is enormous?

This would be acceptable, but...

> After all, this was the *real* purpose of this thread, which nobody
> bothered answering so far.

... you were talking about advancing to Guile 2.x as the next step,
and if I have understood your original e-mail correctly, this speed is
only available with 3.x.


    Werner
  • Re: State of LilyPo... Han-Wen Nienhuys
    • Re: State of L... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
      • Re: State ... Han-Wen Nienhuys
        • Re: St... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
          • Re... Werner LEMBERG
            • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... Werner LEMBERG
              • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... Werner LEMBERG
              • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... Werner LEMBERG
              • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... Werner LEMBERG
              • ... David Kastrup
              • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... Werner LEMBERG
              • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... Werner LEMBERG
              • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... Werner LEMBERG

Reply via email to