Am Donnerstag, dem 20.05.2021 um 22:46 +0200 schrieb Federico Bruni: > On Thu, May 20 2021 at 08:26:18 +0200, Jonas Hahnfeld > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, I *hope* that it would be straight-forward to produce binaries > > with the same set of scripts, provided dependencies like Guile and > > friends don't choke about the architecture. It clearly needs a native > > build host, but it's not obvious to me how much users (would) run > > LilyPond on AArch64... > > Not many, but in the last year I read messages from a few users (on > lilypond-user mailing list) trying to build lilypond for this > architecture (on raspberrypy and some other device). > > Actually I asked because I'm trying to build an aarch64 lilypond > bundled in Frescobaldi flatpak. I *think* I can cross-build it using my > x86_64 laptop. I'm following this guide: > https://developer.puri.sm/Librem5/Apps/Packaging_Apps/Building_Flatpaks/Cross-Building.html
Cross-compilation is exactly the major point that I'm trying to avoid for the new setup; it's just super complicated and if the architecture isn't wide-spread enough that we can find a machine to build natively, there's probably not much point in providing official binaries. Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
