Le 24/06/2021 à 08:16, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development a écrit :
Am Donnerstag, dem 24.06.2021 um 01:02 +0200 schrieb Federico Bruni:
On Tue, Jun 22 2021 at 17:53:05 +0200, Jean Abou Samra
<[email protected]> wrote:
Yes. And on GitLab, if this turned out to be a significant
problem, we could also add a "Translation" label, and
let translators use the "Subscribe to label" feature.

https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2016/04/13/feature-highlight-subscribe-to-label/
This is a good idea.
Labels can be applied to issues and MR too. I might subscribe to the
Translation label and track only that to help when I can.
I agree, using only lilypond-devel and GitLab sounds like a good way
forward.

Ok, there seems to be agreement here.

https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/819

We already have a "Translation" label, just need to use it.

Ah! Thanks, I wasn't aware.

And we should probably document the new workflows in the CG...

I'll give that a try.

While at it, we might also want to colorize our existing labels - there
should be more than just blue 🙂 I'd imagine red-ish colors for Crash,
Critical, Defect, and Regression; orange for Collision, Ugly, and
Warning; green for Enhancement, Maintainability, and Performance; and
maybe gray-ish for categories like Scripts, Translation, etc.?

Good idea. I'll let others choose the colors; with the Pygments
style, I've had enough of moving the cursor around on an HTML
color picker ;-)

Cheers,
Jean

Reply via email to