> I would highly prefer to not mix switching the default backend with switching > to Guile 2.2 that > will already be disruptive enough (yes, it's going slower than I had > hoped...).
At the moment, I have trouble seeing how Guile 2 could be made to work well. The absence of error locations is a source of frustration. My understanding is that this is a design limitation of Guile 2 and later when interpreting code (as opposed to byte-compiling).
