On 2021-10-05 12:42 pm, Jefferson Felix wrote:
I just did this change locally, only the message is different (running
Guile 2), because someone also can build from source using guile 2.
I agree with this solution.
Would it make any sense for LilyPond in general to be able to report
dependencies in a manner similar to FFmpeg and ImageMagick? Granted,
those projects can be built for myriad configurations, so it is
essential to be able to know what libraries are compiled in. However,
with Guile 3 on the horizon too, it could be wise for LilyPond to
indicate the specific versions being used for any dependency, including
GhostScript and Cairo. Such a solution would then be part of the core
distribution.
-- Aaron Hill
