>> How far do you intend to push this style? Are you going to be >> content with a single denominator or allow stuff like >> >> 2 1 2+2+3 >> - + - for ----- >> q q. 8 > > Optimally, yes. But right now I’m trying to get a few singles in > before swinging for the fences…
BTW, Gould gives the following example in her book (also noting that
it would be better to use 15/16 together with a '2+3 sempre' remark
instead).
3
------
8 ~ 8.
(the tilde denotes a tie).
Werner
