Am Samstag, dem 19.02.2022 um 21:04 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
> <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > > Having byte-compiled files in the
> > > user's cache removes the ability to completely uninstall and negates
> > > the ease of moving the installation around with static binaries.
> > 
> > Byte-compiled files from LilyPond never end up in the user's cache,
> > they always go to the versioned directory in share/ (as you write in
> > your other reply).
> 
> How would that work without the user having write permission there?

It doesn't. Compilation is an explicit choice by users right now, by
setting an environment variable. If they do this and can't write in the
installation directory, their problem.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

    • Re: Blockers f... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
      • Re: Blocke... David Kastrup
        • Re: Bl... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
          • Re... David Kastrup
          • Re... David Kastrup
            • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
  • Re: Blockers for Gu... Jean Abou Samra
    • Re: Blockers f... Jean Abou Samra
    • Re: Blockers f... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
      • Re: Blocke... David Kastrup
        • Re: Bl... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
      • Re: Blocke... Jean Abou Samra
        • Re: Bl... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
          • Re... Jean Abou Samra
            • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... Jean Abou Samra
              • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... Werner LEMBERG
              • ... Kieren MacMillan
              • ... Karlin High

Reply via email to