> It seems to me most natural the TeX would be having the last word > (if you'll look after the lame pun there), and thereby lilypond > should indirect somewhat its internal sense of page numbering, so > that some negotiation can happen wrt to where things are... > > It seems to me this discussion is relevant to what I'm trying to say > > https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/15989/toc-entries-and-labels-for-included-pdf-pages
You should also have a look at https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/21248/how-to-add-a-page-number-to-the-included-pdf-pages > I can see the posted code tries to do something like this, but it > seems there's more to it than this, per Werner's point, with which I > agree. It's straightforward to modify my updated LaTeX snippet (sent recently to the list) to use, say, ``` \includepdf[pagecommand={\thispagestyle{headings}}, ...]{foo.pdf} ``` to get correct page numbers added to the included PDF file (of course, you should suppress page numbers in the included files). Werner
