On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 22:26 +0200, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > Le 14/04/2022 à 22:14, Jonas Hahnfeld a écrit : > > On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 21:59 +0200, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > > I still see 4 issues with the GUB label in the issue tracker. Should we > > > close them? > > Probably. I already closed the few issues that were related to how GUB > > worked internally. For the rest, it would be good to go over the > > reports and see if any of the problems could potentially also affect > > the new binaries. I already did this for one Windows problem (which was > > actually fixed in GUB years ago...), the rest is for macOS which I'm > > not *that* familiar with... > > OK, let's go over them: > > https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/3862 is about the icon of > the app, which should be irrelevant now?
Depends on whether we want to package the binaries into a LilyPond.app package again at some point because this is how macOS people expect. But likely not relevant right now. > https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/2772 is about 'dylib > redirection'. AFAICS that's not relevant with static binaries? > > https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6143: same kind of issue. Yes, should likely be fixed "by design". > https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/1307 - not sure. Me neither, but may be the same problem. I think the two threads are https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2010-02/msg00046.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-06/msg00428.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part