Jean Abou Samra <[email protected]> writes: > Le 22/05/2022 à 17:04, David Kastrup a écrit : >> [...] >>> Also see >>> >>> guile$ git shortlog -ns --since="2 months ago" >>> 2 Timothy Sample >>> 1 Ludovic Courtès >>> 1 Mikael Djurfeldt >> Well, it's the stable release branch. > > > What would be the development branch? > > $ git branch --show-current > main > $ git shortlog -ns v3.0.8..HEAD > 6 Ludovic Courtès > 2 Timothy Sample > 1 Andy Wingo > 1 Mikael Djurfeldt > 1 Rob Browning > 1 Sergei Trofimovich > 1 Vijay Marupudi
I am not in control of Guile's development models or lack thereof. I simply reported the information on their website that distributors would go by. >> [...] >> No, Guile is in trouble then. I mean, it is in trouble now. But if >> distributors can easily do version-hopping on their own initiative and >> end up with one version of Guile they are going to ship for their whole >> distro, it would be good if that does not end up in making LilyPond >> disappear. That's all. >> >> What we _recommend_ and use ourselves is an entirely different matter. > > > OK, but in that case, what is your request concretely? > Current LilyPond master works with Guile 3.0. That's essentially all. I wasn't sure of that from the discussion and from what I remembered from previous exchanges. > Do you want to add it to the CI? I am afraid that I am not tracking the development of Guile and the CI resources of LilyPond well enough to venture any opinion that would be more qualified than that of the current developers. -- David Kastrup
