Jean Abou Samra <j...@abou-samra.fr> writes: > Le 15/11/2022 à 14:17, David Kastrup a écrit : >> Alternatively, providing something approaching the previous behavior >> under a different name, assuming that this functionality has at least >> some motivation or possibility to continue existing. > > > > It's not a behavior change, just a mundane calling convention > change that makes the function more flexible and consistent > with interpret-markup. No "functionality" is being removed.
If it's "mundane", why would the conversion result in a complex replacement? -- David Kastrup
