Am So., 1. Jan. 2023 um 23:58 Uhr schrieb Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org>: > > > > What are the html equivalents of @qq{…} and @q{…}? > > There is no stand-alone equivalent to `@q`. If you write > > ``` > <q>foo</q> > ``` > > it gets converted by `pandoc` to > > ``` > ``foo'' > ``` > > which `makelsr.pl` in turn converts to `@qq{foo}`. > > You get > > ``` > `foo' > ``` > > only for the inner quote environment if you use `<q> ... <q> ... </q> > ... </q>`. This is not handled by `makelsr.pl` but it could be added. > > > Werner
What to do with /Documentation/snippets/new/direction-of-merged-fa-shape-note-heads.ly then? The title uses 'fa'. Its description contains @q{fa}. In http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.24/Documentation/snippets/pitches#pitches-direction-of-merged-_0027fa_0027-shape-note-heads it reads as: Direction of merged ’fa’ shape note heads [...]the direction of ‘fa’ shape note heads[...] I could do (in the description) (1) <q>fa</q> (2) ‘fa’ (3) 'fa' What do you recommend? Thanks, Harm