> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> > To: lilypond-u...@gnu.org, lilypond-devel@gnu.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 07:10:57 +0000 (UTC) > Subject: Re: clefs, time signatures, and key signatures > > >> please have a look at Merge Request 2188 and comment there on how > >> to proceed with the new distances between clefs and time > >> signatures, together with the new distances between clefs and key > >> signatures. > >> > >> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/2188 > >> > >> The question is whether the new distances should be based on the > >> widest standard clef glyph (which is the alto clef, and which is > >> done currently in the MR), or whether they should be based on the > >> most common one, the treble clef. > > > > For better comparison, I've updated/added the screenshots in the MR > > so that you can do a blink-comparison of the images. > > A few people responded, and the opinions are exactly 50:50. It would > be great if more people could chime in! > > > Werner >
I think that the distances between the clef and the sigs are improved Elaine
