> I'm not insulting anyone.
It is not up to you to decide that.
> These are facts.
It is always possible to argue without using foul language.
> Of course if you modify certain scheme files and remove the parts
> that concern hel-arabic, it may not work. I challenge you, my
> initial version which did not depend at all on Lilypond worked very
> well without modifying anything. Initial hel-arabic which does not
> depend on lilypond allows you to write any Western or Arabic music,
> after which I modified it so that it integrates perfectly with
> lilypond. hel-arabic.ly initially could be called directly, by
> putting it in the folder containing the ly file to compile.
This is not integration at all. What you describe is an *add-on*
file, without any integration. If you insist on that we can easily
remove `hel-arabic.ly` from LilyPond.
> I had proven at the time to James that hel-arabic.ly could be used
> without modifying anything, he had wanted the integration of this
> hel-arabic file and I was forced to modify certain scheme files to
> that the integration goes well
You were 'forced'? I doubt that. You could always have said 'no, I
don't want that'.
Werner
