Il giorno dom 27 lug 2025 alle 10:01:06 +00:00:00, Werner LEMBERG
<w...@gnu.org> ha scritto:
A similar problem with the Noto family has been recently discussed:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2025-07/msg00073.html
If you compile LilyPond from scratch please retry a compilation with a
FontConfig version equal to or larger than 2.15 – theoretically,
Variation Fonts should be rejected correctly. If you can't or won't
do that you have to replace the VFs with non-VF versions.
I compiled LilyPond from scratch using FontConfig 2.16.
$ rpm -q fontconfig
fontconfig-2.16.0-2.fc42.x86_64
Fedora is using this version since January:
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/fontconfig/fontconfig/fedora-42.html
I don't think I can remove the VF fonts:
$ sudo dnf remove *noto*-vf*
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: installed package fontconfig-2.16.0-2.fc42.x86_64 requires
font(:lang=en), but none of the providers can be installed
- installed package cairo-1.18.2-3.fc42.x86_64 requires
libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- installed package default-fonts-core-sans-4.2-4.fc42.noarch
requires google-noto-sans-vf-fonts, but none of the providers can be
installed
- installed package gnome-shell-48.3-1.fc42.x86_64 requires
libcairo.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- conflicting requests
- problem with installed package
I guess I will have to use a container to build lilypond. Which Linux
distro should work fine?
