On 02/06/2026 02:13, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2026 at 6:32 PM Flaming Hakama by Elaine <
[email protected]> wrote:
Current Lilypond Pipeline Issue
I'd like to return to the actual concern: is our workflow of automatically
integrating every contribution unless flagged by reviewers broken?
I wonder if we can be more clear about it since there are two implications
in this concern.
<SNIP>
Thank you, Elaine, for drilling down and distilling the issues as you see
them. I feel like I understand the issues much better after reading your
email.
I particularly like that for both pipelines, you view reviewers' time as
valuable. And from what I have read about companies using agent-generated
code, the bottleneck has moved from coding to reviewing; and reviewing has
become much more difficult.
I find your suggestions promising as a starting path for moving forward.
I would also ask reviewers to be less strict about style standards etc
if the PR is a pretty self-contained extension.
Yes I get we want consistency, but if we have a way of accepting PRs
with "style concerns" etc, then good working code can be accepted for
later rework. And as I say, if it's standalone and never gets that work,
it doesn't impact on the core code.
Cheers,
Wol
