On Sun, Aug 16, 2026, 1:51 PM Dan Eble <[email protected]> wrote: > The meaning of our "Crash" label is broad, for example, > > - segmentation fault > - out of memory > - user tired of waiting > - Scheme error > > I propose narrowing the definition of "Crash" to abnormal termination by > the OS and relabeling issues of the latter two kinds as "Defect". >
I was of the understanding we already defined "crash" as program termination with an OS-reported error. So I agree with your proposal Carl > > >
