On 9/24/21, 2:52 PM, "Thomas Morley" <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> wrote:
Am Fr., 24. Sept. 2021 um 22:33 Uhr schrieb Carl Sorensen
<c_soren...@byu.edu>:
>
> We have automatic tests for xml2ly that check compliance with the
musicXML standard.
>
> I'm fairly certain it's a problem with your musicXML, rather than xml2ly.
>
> Unfortunately, I'm not expert enough on musicXML to find the mistakes.
>
> Why are your writing your own musicXML and then using xml2ly, instead of
just writing in lilypond?
>
> Carl
>
>
>
Hi Carl,
iiuc, xml2ly converts an .xml-file to a .ly-file, not the other way round.
Yes, I know this. As far as I can see, Dmitry is writing musicXML files by
hand (which I cannot imagine doing) and then importing them to lilypond using
xml2ly.
Speaking of it, I recently tested several methods to convert ly to xml:
(1) openlilylib (with lilypond-export, Jan-Peter)
(2) python-ly
(3) Frescobaldi
(4) de Wolff (https://github.com/de-wolff/lilypond.git)
and converted the resulting files back to ly with musicxml2ly
(builtin) and xml2ly (https://github.com/grame-cncm/libmusicxml.git,
xml2ly by Jacques)
The results were terrible :((
I totally agree that the musicXML export tools are really not good at all.
I was tempted to offer a very high bounty to get a working xml-export.
Alas, we already have
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/665 and the there
offered bounties are not that low ...
I think that a good musicXML export project is likely a 6-month, full-time
project for an expert in lilypond. For that kind of effort, a 1,000 euro
bounty is not big.
Thanks,
Carl
