I'm running Lilypond 1.6.6, installed from rpm, on a Red Hat 8.0 system. (Two of them, actually, and they're both doing the same thing). When I run xdvi on the dvi output, it looks fine, but the .ps and .pdf are bad.
I have: * Uninstalled and reinstalled the package. (There seems to be a bug in the uninstall script, BTW. I have to create a bogus directory and fonts.dir file to get it to run.) * Verified that the .pfa files are where they belong, and that they are the 1.6.6 versions (or at least that rpm installed them in a directory labelled 1.6.6). * Made sure that my config.ps files say "p +psfonts.map" When I follow this sequence: "Run the command: tex testfont Fill in: Name of font to test = feta20 * \table * \bye Look at the file using xdvi: xdvi testfont you should see a table with different musical symbols. Run dvips -Ppdf -G0 -ulilypond.map testfont Look at the Postscript file using gv (ghostview) gv testfont.ps (or ghostview testfont.ps) you should see the same result. Try to convert the file to PDF: ps2pdf testfont.ps Look at the PDF file: acroread testfont.pdf Again the document should look the same." It works (generating a ton of fonts in the meantime). But when I try to run the actual file (I'm using the wtk1-fugue2.ly sample file), I still get garbage. Any thoughts? Thanks! Geoff __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
