Lilypond gives this:
| | | |
| | | |
+--+--+--+ +--+--+--+
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
| | | |
| | | |
I wanted this:
| | | |
| | | |
+--+--+--+ |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
| +--+--+--+
| | | |
| | | |
But this is supposedly correct:
| | | |
|---+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|---+--+--+ +--+--+--+
| | | |
I'm all confused now. But regardless, it would be nice if
we could get all these possibilites through the tweaking of
parameters. I understand it's not a top priority, but it
would be nice if they were worked in at some point or
another.
Thanks,
Spider
--- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We recently talked with Paul Roberts, a notation guru
> that explained
> > to us that it should really be
> >
> > | | | |
> > |----------------|--|--|
> > |---|--|--| |---|--|--|
> > | | | |
> >
> >
> > (the 1st stem determines the "direction" of the beam)
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
