On Wednesday 24 September 2003 08:30 pm, Graham Percival wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:59:11 +0200 > > ario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So I wanted to convert a file, which has the statement > > \version "1.6.10" in it, using > > -snip- > > > \version "1.7.28" > > > > How come??? > > There were no syntax changes between version 1.7.28 and 1.8.0, so > LilyPond merely printed the number of the version for the last change > it made. > > That said, it might be nicer if it printed the number of its current > version to avoid this confusion. I can't think of any downside to > changing that behaviour, but I'll need to check with Han and/or Jan. > > Cheers, > - Graham
I was wondering about that, thanks. Might I request adding the number of the current version but not removing the version of the last change? A comment would not only be easier to do but more reassuring if not more useful. % Last change version. Current version is "n-n-n": \version "n-n-n" daveA -- Br`er Fox told Br`er Rabbit that the Tar Baby had dissed him, and Fox made a dummy out of tar and put him in Rabbit's path. When the Tar Baby failed to return a civil greeting, Rabbit punched him with a right, a left, both feet and butted him with his forehead. Along came Br`er Fox who saw that he was thoroughly "stuck up". Br`er Fox is much smarter than Br`er Rabbit, and in spite of all Rabbit's pleas for help, no one is going to unstick him and throw him in the briar patch, so now Br`er Fox is liesurely eating Rabbit's liver. D. Raleigh Arnold dra@ http://www.openguitar.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
