* Nicolas Sceaux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The real issue is: what time does it take to write the score with > LilyPond and Finale? IMHO tap tap tap is a lot faster than clic clic > clic. Maybe the learning curve of LilyPond is longer (I don't know), > but having regular text source code and command line are *features*, > not drawbacks, because they make typesetting a lot faster, and reusing > a lot easier.
I couldn't agree more. From my experience (10 years of finale and 1.5 of lilypond), the time to write a "complex" score is more or less the same in both. But scores written in lilypond are far more maintainable than in any binary format, specially if one uses CVS. Cheers, Pedro _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
