[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> A first step to improve the usability of the "programmer reference"
> (which in my opinion is a misnomer)
It's called program reference; suggestions for better names
appreciated.
> would be to give more explicit
> explanations of the possible values for each property.
> One problem is that the set of possible values may be different for the
> same property depending on what kind of object you set it on, but in
> most cases that's not a problem.
We can solve that partly, by having different doc-strings per
interface, by adding
("generic string"
(text-item-interface . "specific doc string")
(rest-interface . "specific doc string")
)
but I think that a first improvement would be to simply add the
information to the interface doc-strings.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
