On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:18:51PM +0100, Vally an Leon wrote:
> > > Stop that nonsense!
> >
> > Complaining about every single worm mail that's distributed on the
> > mailing list isn't really helpfull. Indeed, it doubles the amount of
> > useless mails.
> >
> > For that worm problem: IMHO, the list owners should ASAP
> >
> > a) make the list closed post (only subscribed members may post to the list),
> > b) if that worms come from a subscribed member, kick that member,
> > c) reject every mail containing attachments other than .ly or .png.
>
> IMO only option C) is viable - and it will need a longer whitelist.
Why not (a) and (c)?
I only see a problem with implementing (b) as there are definitely
forged posts being made. Am I missing anything?
Nick
==============------- www.SongBirdofSwing.com -------==================
Nick Busigin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit Our Indie Jazz CD Construction Project!
==============------- www.SongBirdofSwing.com -------==================
_______________________________________________
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
