> I didn't mean that it had to be implemented, only that if it is > implemented it has to be the number of the first bar in the line. We > agree on that, but I was trying to convince the original poster, who > presumably did not agree.
I think I was the original poster, and I certainly do agree. My problem was simply the lack of any bar number on a line that started half-way through a measure, and I'm quite happy with the fix of preventing a line break half-way through a measure. -- http://www.mupsych.org/~rrt/ Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes (Anon) _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
