Am 26.04.2015 um 18:10 schrieb Michael Hendry:
On 26 Apr 2015, at 15:16, H. S. Teoh <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 06:15:13AM +0000, Keith OHara wrote:
Michael Hendry <hendry.michael <at> gmail.com <http://gmail.com>>
writes:
I routinely put the bar checks at the _beginnings_ of the bars,
thus...
| a4 b c d
| a8 b c d e f g a
| a16 b c d e f g a b c d e f g a b
That works very nicely.
When I had a measure that took more than one line of input, I used to
try to make that clear by indenting the continuation line a bit
further, but that was lost on any auto-indenting. Now I can just
| \acciaccatura d,8 <b, g>4.(\ff )b8 a4.( )g8
| a4.( )c8 b4.( )a8
| \acciaccatura ais8 b8[-.\fz ]b-. b[-.\fz ]b-.
b[-.\fz ]b-. \acciaccatura ais8 b[-.\fz ]b-.
| <c, d b>8 r <c, c a>8\downbow r \acciaccatura d, <b, g>2
and I can easily find my measures.
[...]
Am I the only one who puts bar checks at *both* the beginning and end of
a bar?
| a4 b c d |
| e f g a |
Probably <G>.
Why would you want to check each bar twice?
These bar checks are mostly for humans to ease reading of the code, not
for machine interpreting.
Yours, Simon
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
