>> This is what I meant with `defending your code'. And sometimes it
>> simply happens that there is no concensus.
>
> I hope you simply didn't read Janek's comment carefully enough. The
> main point in his last sentence is not about the alternative but
> about an attitude of rejecting suggestions simply because one
> doesn't understand their use case. Which *is* off-putting in a
> non-constructive manner that can't really be justified with
> "defeding code".
Hmm, OK. It's a bit hard for me to see the fine distinction – you
have to convince the other developer(s) in both situations, which
might be a long and exhausting process –, but I acknowledge that the
difference is important to you, Janek, and maybe other contributors.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
