2015-05-04 8:43 GMT+02:00 pls <[email protected]>: > This looks like a regression to me. See > > https://codereview.appspot.com/4176056/ (allow non numeric fingers (e.g. for > thumb)) > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/input/regression/dd/lily-caf6e8f6.ly (the “P” > is not printed) > > hth > patrick
Hi Patrick, thanks for your findings. This (for me formerly unknown feature) has gone with my patch for issue 2752 https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2752 It was never documented and the regtest for _exactly_ this was _not_ triggered, as you can read there. So the first time it came up http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/2-19-14-lost-ability-to-add-note-name-in-fret-board-td166644.html I wrote: " I wouldn't call it a regression, because adding and printing strings in dots was not documented, not really supported (as far as scaling is concerned) and not covered by a regtest, as far as I can tell. Therefore I did not pay attention to keep this functionality while creating the patch for Issue 2752: Parenthesize dots in fretboards [...] " Consequences: First, I'll update Issue 4120 https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4120 label it regression. Second, provide a patch as soon I'll find some time. Though, the main question(s): Why was the regtest not trigered? Leading to: Can we trust our regression-tests anymore? Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
