OK. Fuller answer.
1) It's easy to create a snippet in the LSR: it was designed for this purpose.
It's harder to update the main LilyPond package.
2) If the main package were updated, then we would also need to update the
documentation.
3) All the work on LilyPond is done by volunteers who may have other priorities.
4) The functionality you're using is not needed often: why bother to add it to
the main package? It's trivial to find in the LSR if you look.
So: if you want to extend LilyPond in a particular way, do what the rest of us
here have done: read the Contributors Guide and start work.
HTH
--
Phil Holmes
----- Original Message -----
From: Gianmaria Lari
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: lilypond-user
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: rhytm
I started using lilypond two weeks ago, wouldn't be a bit presumptuous for me
to propose this? Why the person that create the snippet does not propose it?
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net> wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gianmaria Lari"
<gianmarial...@gmail.com>
To: <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: rhytm
Thank you!! It works, very nice!
Usual question (usual for me): why this functionality is not part of the
standard lilypond?
Usual answer:
http://lilypond.org/website/help-us.html
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
