Am Montag, 29. Juni 2015 15:20 CEST, Stefan Thomas <kontrapunktste...@gmail.com> schrieb:
> Dear community, > I run in a problem, when I transpose the below quoted figured bass from g > to f. > In this special case the natural sign before the "5" in the 2nd chord > should be a flat sign. Is it possible to get a transposable version of this > figured bass? Just a question - is this an example drawn from a historic source? What you call a "flat sign" would back then be called a "fa-sign" and the corresponing "sharp sign" would be read as a "mi sign". Both "voces" are independent of transposition, so "C♭" does _not_ denote a C flat (ces) but rather a C-fa which is exactly what is needed in your example in _both_ cases, so (in case this is not an original source) you might better write 65♭ in the first, untransposed case. HTH Ralf Mattes _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
