Thank you for explanation David. Cheers, Pierre 2015-07-03 9:06 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <[email protected]>:
> Pierre Perol-Schneider <[email protected]> writes: > > > Oops! here again. > > Try the following example: > > > > Your problem was that you declared partial bars at the end of each > movement to be "complete" and gave them bar checks and whole-bar rests. > > That's not going to fly with LilyPond. It _is_ actually possible to > make LilyPond treat them like that, but then you have to declare the > length of the bar at its _start_ by using \partial on it. Here is how > to do that: > > > > The latter version lets you use a "full-bar rest" at its end (but I > think that is a rather bad idea since the reader will have a hard time > figuring out its actual length) and will result in more measures since > then the partial bar at the start of the second movement gets its own > measure number. I'm not convinced that is a good idea either but then > it's probably a question of what was written in the original. > > -- > David Kastrup > >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
