Hello Andrew, I seen to get what you want with the followin, maybe with too long stems though :
\override Stem.stemlet-length = #0.75 Can you try that? JM > Le 7 août 2015 à 15:25, N. Andrew Walsh <[email protected]> a écrit : > > PS- obviously, that's a typo in the first paragraph of my last message: it > should read "16th note with a secondary BEAM" (not stem). Anyway, here > attached is a (really terrible freehand GIMP-made) drawing of what I want to > see. > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:12 PM, N. Andrew Walsh <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>wrote: > Hi David/Andrew/'ponders, > > actually, what I want is two things: that the stem extends downward from the > beam, and that this stemlet is connected to the following 16th note with a > secondary stem. As it is now, the secondary beam stops midway between the c16 > and the r16. > > In short, what I want to see is that the beams look exacty the same whether > it's a note or a rest under them. Setting stem length with the \verride fixes > the first part, but does it also achieve the latter? > > Cheers, > > A > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:57 PM, David Kastrup <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > "N. Andrew Walsh" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> writes: > > > So, I have the following: > > > { c2~ c4 c8[ r16 c16] | c4 } > > > > in Lily, the r16 does not get a stem, nor a second beam, which looks … > > muddled. How do I change this behavior? > > \override Stem.stemlet-length = #0.5 > > -- > David Kastrup > > > <french beaming.png>_______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
