2015-08-09 16:20 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard <[email protected]>:
> Hi Harm,
>
> Well, are the glyphs that lilypond automatically puts in for acciaccaturas
> slurs or ties? I am quite confused. I thought they were slurs. The manual
> suggests to my way of reading that they are slurs, and the slur up and down
> functions work on them. But I just don’t know.
\acciaccatura uses Slur, ofcourse!
But I think it does not make any sense to write a slur between equal notes.
As a player I'd always read the second example as a Tie.
{ c''1~ c'' }
{ c''1( c'') }
>
> Also, for my score I have customised flared ties throughout globally that
> match the contemporary manuscript I am setting, but I need distinctly curved
> slurs for grace notes, so I can’t really use the ties to look like slurs.
One can deal with it:
startGraceMusic = {
\temporary \override Tie.stencil = #ly:tie::print
}
stopGraceMusic = {
\revert Tie.stencil
}
\relative c'' {
\override Tie.stencil =
#(lambda (grob) (grob-interpret-markup grob " whatever"))
c1~ c
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t
\grace { g8~ cis_~ }
<g cis ees>4 s2.
c1~ c
}
So the main question remains, what's meant? Really a Slur or a Tie?
Default-Tie looks as I would think it should.
Slurs may be far more difficult to adjust, I see no other way than
going for the control-points, directly or via
shape/shapeII/some-custom-function.
Cheers,
Harm
> Andrew
>
>
> On 9 August 2015 at 23:47:42, Thomas Morley ([email protected])
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Do you really mean Slurs??
>
> Why not:
>
> \relative c'' {
> \set tieWaitForNote = ##t
> \grace { g8~ cis_~ }
> <g cis ees>
> }
>
>
> Cheers,
> Harm
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
