Hi Urs, >>> Any suggestions? >> >> https://letsencrypt.org/ ? > > Thanks. Looks like it's worth a look, even when they probably aren't "known" > to the browsers yet. > > Any idea how this compares to cacert.org (conceptually, morally)?
Let's encrypt is probably the way to go (at least from what I know). While cacert is a nice idea that I support, it never got a widespread use (known by browsers) for several reasons. Let's encrypt is discussed for almost a year now [1] and it is the common effort of free software communities and the big players to get widespread SSL. It is supported by the EFF as well as most browsers. I haven't tested that, but at least they say that the browsers should accept the certificates [2]. Cheers, Joram [1]: For Urs in German: http://www.heise.de/security/meldung/Let-s-Encrypt-Mozilla-und-die-EFF-mischen-den-CA-Markt-auf-2460155.html [1a]: http://www.heise.de/security/meldung/Erstes-Zertifikat-von-Let-s-Encrypt-zum-Test-bereit-2814330.html [2]: https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/frequently-asked-questions-faq/26 _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
