Simon Albrecht <[email protected]> writes:
> On 19.09.2015 22:48, David Kastrup wrote:
>> However, (re-)using engravers for the "picking apart" bit in a context
>> without its own vertical axis group might be an interesting option.
>> Want several text spanners? Use several contexts.
>
> This reminds me: the ‘standard’ use case for this kind of text spanner
> is ri -- tar -- dan -- do or the like, i.e. actually a Tempo Spanner
> <https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3176/>. It would make
> sense to have this in a separate context (TempoLine?) at the top of
> the system. However, as I already said in the issue, tempo spanners
> should correspond to MetronomeMarks in syntax, so this would require
> complete abandoning of the current \tempo syntax, wouldn’t it?
> Alternatively, we might retain the current method as is and add a new
> one with support for tempo spanners, entered in a manner alike to
> lyrics entering:
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%
> timeTrack = {
> \time 3/4
> Prestissimo2.
> \bar "||"
> \time 2/2
> Larghetto1*4
> ral2 -- len --
> tan -- do
> s1
> \bar "|."
> }
More like
timeTrack = \lyricmode {
\time 3/4
Prestissimo2.
\bar "||"
\time 2/2
Larghetto1*4
ral2 -- len --
tan -- do
\skip 1
\bar "|."
}
namely with some small changes bringing it back into the embrace of
currently supported syntax.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
