Hi Neil.
That can’t be the way to do it, even though it works. In pure principle, it’s
way too much code complexity for the simplicity required. Just plain inelegant.
Playing with your example, it is clear that lilypond is doing its maximum best
to avoid a collision between the ledger lines and the accidentals of the note
group in question. I tried using proportional notation on the example, but for
me, it never really gets these issues right, no matter what duration you choose
for the moment. Lilypond is so skilful at avoiding collisions that it always
seems difficult to get it to behave otherwise. In the New Complexity School
style music I engrave, this issue comes up all the time, and the composer I
work with is a stickler for the proportional notation being right, so I have a
similar interest in this issue.
List gurus, what is the proper way to achieve the desired spacing in this case?
Andrew
On 22/09/2015, 10:59, "Neil Thornock"
<lilypond-user-bounces+andrew.bernard=gmail....@gnu.org on behalf of
neilthorn...@gmail.com> wrote:
\new StaffGroup <<
\new Staff { \overrideProperty
Score.NonMusicalPaperColumn.line-break-system-details #'((Y-offset . 20)
(alignment-distances . (0))) \transpose c c' { \voiceOne <f'' e''>16 q q q
q16*1/2 \hideNotes c16*1/2 \unHideNotes q16 q q q q q q \times 2/3 { q8 q q } }
}
\new Staff \transpose c c' { \times 2/3 { des'4 des'8 } \times 2/3 {
b8\rest <ces'' bes'>8 q } \times 2/3 { q q q } q q }
>>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
