2015-10-02 13:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <[email protected]>:
>
> Hi, issue 4625 in the tracker
> <URL:https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4625/> is the final
> straw to provide an actual input syntax for setting the spanner-id
> property introduced before version 2.16. I think currently only slurs
> and phrasing slurs heed them. While the principal property is a string,
> I think it makes sense to also allow numbers.
>
> How do people feel about choosing one of the following variations of
> \- and \= (code compiles and does the expected thing even in 2.18):
(1)
I'd prefer \=
(2)
> % should we prefer this variant in the docs?
>
> \relative { c'\-1-( d\-2-( e\-1-) f\-2-) }
I don't think we show Slurs with "-" very often in the docs, thus I'd go for:
\relative { c'\=1( d\=2( e\=1) f\=2) }
(3)
> % if so, how to write slur directions?
I'd only demonstrate:
\relative { c'^\=1( d\=2( e\=1) f\=2) }
because for conflicting direction-modifiers the one typed first will win.
See:
\relative { c'^\=1_( d\=2( e\=1) f\=2) }
(4)
Observation:
Using Slurs with and without setted 'spanner-id works as well
\relative { c'\=1( d( e\=1) f) }
\relative { c'\=1(^( e\=1)) }
Cheers,
Harm
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
