Hello, I’ve sometimes played scores with « 1st time only » and « 2nd time only » in such cases. Is that often used by professional engravers?
JM > Le 2 oct. 2015 à 20:27, David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> a écrit : > > Quoting Johan Vromans (jvrom...@squirrel.nl): >> On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 19:41:21 +0100 >> Anthonys Lists <antli...@youngman.org.uk> wrote: >> >>> Anyways, I think we've all missed the OPs problem. As he phrased it, I >>> understand he wants >>> >>> {fixed part 1} {alternative 1} {alternative 2} {fixed part 2} repeat >> >> I'm not familiar with a clean notation for the above. > > Nor me. It would usually help if the OP could post an example of what > they wanted, either published or cobbled together. > >> For the normal repeat, with alternative endings, this would be >> >> |: fixed part 1 |1 alterrnative 1 :|2 alternative 2 | >> >> Would this be understood by the average musician? >> >> |: fixed part 1 |1 alterrnative 1 |2 alternative 2 | fixed part 2 :| > > Understood? Well "my" attached "partial solution" (which I've > completed only by using inkscape) would be understood in such a small > piece. If it ran over several pages, then perhaps not. But even then, > it couldn't be misunderstood upon reflection, because all its elements > are used in a completely conventional manner. The only unusual thing > is seeing no :| at the end of closed volta brackets (because you don't > go back at that point). > > Liked? Don't know. What do people think? > > Useful? Well, it's funny how a piece immediately pops up that could > benefit from such a construction. I'm looking at a copy of "When rooks > fly homeward" by Arthur Baynon. It's a piece with two verses of 9 bars > each, where the music for each verse is identical apart from the fifth > bar whose rhythm is 8 4 8 4 4 and then 4 8 8 4 4. > If I were asked to produce a copy on two staves for an accompanist > (something I have often done), it would be an ideal candidate for this > construction, though I certainly would not use half-bars. > (But as it is, it's simple enough for most choirs to sight-read with > no accompaniment, but for one soprano typo in that 84844 bar.) > > Cheers, > David. > <cheat.png>_______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user