Am 10.10.2015 um 13:27 schrieb Federico Bruni: > Il giorno sab 10 ott 2015 alle 13:12, Simon Albrecht > <[email protected]> ha scritto: >> On 10.10.2015 13:10, Federico Bruni wrote: >>> I wouldn't suggest to enable "Save document is possible" when saving >>> to an SSD disk. >> >> Why that? >> ~ Simon > > I don't know if it's still true for modern SSD but I often find > documentation or tutorials saying to be cautious about the number of > writes to a SSD drive. Probably outdated nowadays but I've never > investigated. >
I think that's an inherent problem, so it won't really be outdated anytime. But I think when we're talking about a system with compilers, possibly also with Frescobaldi's auto-compile on, it's somewhat out-of-proportion to "optimize" here. But anyway, you have also realized that Frescobaldi *does* save the file anyway, only to a temporary file with generated name. The only way out of that would be if LilyPond could learn to take its input from stdin. Which might be a nice thing anyway? Urs -- Urs Liska www.openlilylib.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
