On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, David Kastrup wrote:
> Well, arguably it makes a bit more sense than Knuth's choice of a
> magstep being a factor of 1.2. Because the powers of 2^{1:12} as the
> basis of half a magstep are known to be close enough for practical
> purposes to a variety of small-integer-based ratios.
So, will a future version allow microtypographical 2^{1/19} magnification
steps? :-)
--
Matthew Skala
[email protected] People before principles.
http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
