Am 13.11.2015 um 15:03 schrieb Paul Morris: >> On Nov 13, 2015, at 5:58 AM, Urs Liska <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Regaring the location of the individual libraries, what would you >> consider best: >> >> * adding all beside oll-core >> (keeping the option that anyone creates libraries in their own place) >> * creating a new openlilylib sibling organization for that purpose >> * Just have library maintainers maintain their repos in their own >> namespace >> (providing a central listing of available libraries in some >> place, of course) >> > Does this depend somewhat on how the documentation will work?
No :-) > Seems like centralized documentation would be easier with centralized > repos, but maybe it would work fine either way… We'll have a central place where libraries are registered (this is part of the plans for the "package manager"). Registered libraries are basically pointers to remote repositories. That means if you create a library against openLilyLib this is originally private (note: this will make it possible to create private/project/house repositories that take advantage of the openLilyLib infrastructure). When that library is registered with openLilyLib we'll have the URL available to pull the repository in and create the documentation. I hope we'll also manage to provide a hook so when that library is later pushed to Github the documentation is automatically updated. I think we'll then provide a script to (locally) generate documentation for just the library and another one to create and deploy the full set of docs. Urs > > -Paul
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
