David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> writes: > On Sat 28 Nov 2015 at 06:23:00 (-0700), Gilberto Agostinho wrote: >> David Kastrup wrote >> > So how should this be rigged instead? Nominal length, unless that would >> > swallow all of the following notelength or more? And otherwise scale >> > down repeatedly by a factor of 2 until it doesn't? >> >> That sounds like an excellent approach as appogiaturas should be played with >> their nominal lengths. For instance, see the first bar of the original >> notation of Mozart's Alla Turca rondo: >> >> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n184220/mozart_allaturca.png> >> >> It should be interpreted as: >> >> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n184220/RondoAllaTurcaMozart.png> >> > > That's not true for all appoggiaturas of that era, is it? I was > taught that c8 b4. would be performed as c4 b8 or even c4 b8-. which > would sound like c4 b16 r16 perhaps. > > Looking in learned texts, I've just come across one where > c8 b2 r2 is to be performed c2 b2 so that rest is gone. > > (c8 is an appoggiatura in all cases above.)
Man, that's just sick. Are there rules given in your learned texts about what to pick when? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
